HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson:
How Will His Policies Affect the States?
When President Bush nominated Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson as Secretary
of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), he called Thompson “a
creative, conservative, compassionate governor” and a “champion … for
disadvantaged Americans.” Yet his appointment raised concerns among pro-choice,
anti-tobacco and anti-poverty advocates.
Based on his record in Wisconsin, Secretary Thompson is expected to favor more flexibility
in state administration of health programs. As
Governor, Thompson was a leader for expanding
Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance
Program (SCHIP). Wisconsin was the first state to ask
the Health Care Finance Administration for an 1115 Medicaid waiver to cover the working poor.
Wisconsin State Representative Antonio Riley (Flemming Fellow ’94 and CPA Board
Member) considered Thompson a “progressive
Republican governor” who was hindered by political
pressures. He was “willing to advance ideas that strengthen
the health care safety net and improve access to
health care services,” according to Riley.
At the same time, Thompson has a fairly anti-choice record on reproductive rights. As governor,
he supported a parental consent bill, a 24-hour
waiting period and a ban on late-term abortions.
Thompson’s late-term ban mandated life imprisonment for
doctors who perform the procedure.
Because of his anti-choice position, Thompson may try to reverse the FDA’s decision to approve
the use of Mifeprex, originally known as RU-486,
for medical abortions. Thompson raised concerns
during his confirmation hearing when he suggested
that further FDA investigation of the drug’s safety
remains a distinct possibility.
Prior to confirmation, Secretary Thompson was also criticized for having close ties to
tobacco companies. Once confirmed, however,
Thompson pledged to work aggressively to discourage smoking.
Thompson is known as the architect of the first and most sweeping overhaul of welfare programs
in the country. He privatized Wisconsin’s
eligibility determination process, cutting costs and
streamlining the process. Yet, many families were wrongly
denied assistance by for-profit and non-profit
companies whose revenues were sometimes based on
reducing the number of recipients. It is likely that states
will see Thompson use his power to grant waivers
to “reform” other programs that fall under the
purview of HHS. Indeed, Wisconsin has a waiver request
now pending with the Department of Agriculture to “privatize” the administration of food stamps.
In addition to these issues, Thompson has said he plans
to focus on health care reform, long-term care for seniors, the expansion of
opportunities for the disabled, and advancements in biotechnology and scientific
research.