Patchwork Policies Provide Partial Benefits to Immigrants
By Wendy Zimmermann and Karen Tumlin, the Urban Institute
Despite federal benefit restorations and the many states who do assist
immigrants, the social safety net for immigrants remains weaker than
before welfare reform, according to Patchwork Policies: State Assistance for
Immigrants under Welfare Reform, a new report from the Urban Institute’s
Assessing the New Federalism project.
This survey of officials in all 50 states found that few states fully
replaced lost federal benefits. Most states that created substitute programs
simultaneously placed conditions on eligibility, rendering many immigrants
ineligible. Where they exist, state general assistance and health programs are
of little help because they often serve only targeted populations and provide
lower benefits than their federal counterparts.
Several vulnerable groups remain outside the safety net, including
immigrants entering the United States after the passage of welfare reform in
August 1996 and the elderly. Citizen children of non-citizen parents who remain
ineligible for federal food stamp benefits are also disadvantaged since their
households receive reduced benefits.
In the Urban Institute survey, states are placed into four
groupings ranging from those that made their safety nets the most available to
immigrants to those that made their safety nets least available. The groupings
are based on the extent to which states create new, state-funded, substitute
programs for immigrants and the access they give immigrants to state-run
general assistance and health programs.
For a full copy of the report, visit the Urban Institute’s web
site, www.urban.org or call Bonnie Nowak at 202-261-5850.