CPA HOME  |  SEARCH ARCHIVE  |  CURRENT EDITION

ALTERNATIVES
Newsletter of the Center for Policy Alternatives

 

 


State Payments for Medicaid Managed Care Vary Widely

By John Holahan, the Urban Institute

The first nationwide comparison of how much states pay for Medicaid managed care shows more than a two-fold variation in rates. A new survey by the Urban Institute measures capitation rates, which refer to the amount per Medicaid enrollee that the state pays to the managed care plan per month.

Of the 36 states responding to the survey, the highest managed care capitation rates occur in Connecticut, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Texas, Utah, and the District of Columbia; the lowest rates occur in California, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Nevada, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

Rates vary for many reasons. States with low Medicaid fee-for-service rates tend to have lower capitation rates. States where Medicaid managed care enrollment is predominantly in urban areas generally have higher rates. States with strict eligibility criteria are also likely to have higher capitation rates.

On the other hand, states that put a priority on cost savings (versus increased access) in moving Medicaid recipients to managed care tend to have lower capitation rates. States with more mature managed care plans also tend to have lower capitation rates. Finally, states where Medicaid managed care is mandatory tend to have lower capitation rates.

What does the variation in the Medicaid capitation rates paid by states imply for health care consumers? If states with low rates have many plans participating and satisfactory levels of access, then rates in other states may be too high. But states are probably getting what they pay for and this is most likely reflected in the number of managed care organizations participating and in levels of beneficiary access.

For a copy of Medicaid Managed Care Payment Methods and Capitation Rates: Results of a National Survey contact the Urban Institute at 202-261-5666. For further information, visit the Urban Institute website at www.urban.org.

  June 1999
  Vol. 7, No. 5
 
ALTERNATIVES

Alternatives is a publication of the Center for Policy Alternatives – a nonpartisan progressive public policy and leadership development center serving state legislators, state policy organizations, and state grassroots leaders. Alternatives is indexed in Urban Affairs Abstracts. ISSN #1070-3047

Tim McFeeley,
Executive Director
Jane Gruenebaum,
Chief Operating Officer
Linda Tarr-Whelan,
Board Chair

STATE NETWORKS
Diallo Brooks,
Southeast Director
Bettye Jo Pakulis,
Northeast Director
Jesse Romero,
Southwest Director
John Freeman,
Midwest Consultant
Jewel James,
State Networks Manager

POLICY/COMMUNICATIONS
Bernie Horn,
Senior Director, Policy & Communications
Kirsten Lindquist,
Assoc. Director, Policy
Liz Cattaneo,
Assoc. Dir., Communications
Star Wilbraham,
Communications Assistant
Rachel Balick,
Intern
PROGRAM INITIATIVES
Jen Ray,
Senior Director, Program Initiatives
Helen Gonzales,
Senior Manager, Work and Family Investment
John Wilcox,
Senior Manager, Technology Policy
Jennifer Woolley,
Senior Manager, Women and the Economy Program
Christine Broderick,
Intern, Women and the Economy
LEADERSHIP
Carolina Zumaran-Jones,
Director, Eleanor Roosevelt Global Leadership Institute & Flemming Fellows Leadership Institute
Maura Hutchens,
Manager, ERGLI & FFLI
Meredith Gurwith,
Intern, ERGLI
Rebecca Valerin,
Intern, FFLI
ADMINISTRATION/FINANCE
Maxine G. Somerville,
Senior Director of Administration and Human Resources
Tom Gilmer,
Chief Financial Officer
Chantel McCloud,
Manager, Payroll & A/P
John Wilcox,
General Counsel
Shawn Hayden,
Office Manager
DEVELOPMENT
Chris Rutledge,
Associate Director of Development

CPA HOME  |  SEARCH ARCHIVE  |  CURRENT EDITION