CPA HOME  |  SEARCH ARCHIVE  |  CURRENT EDITION

ALTERNATIVES
Newsletter of the Center for Policy Alternatives

 

 


Progressives Eye Ballot Initiatives to Advance Their Agenda

For years, Florida Sen. Kendrick Meek (Flemming Fellow-1996) fought an uphill battle to strengthen public schools, as his proposals were consistently defeated by a conservative-dominated legislature.

FamilySo in 2001, Meek stepped outside the legislative process to launch a ballot initiative campaign to reduce class sizes in every grade throughout the state. His coalition is about to submit the signatures required to qualify the measure for the November 2002 ballot.

Meek is at the forefront of a recent trend-legislators and advocates using ballot initiatives to advance progressive policy. Frustrated by the legislative process, they are finding success in building public campaigns to place statutes or constitutional amendments on the ballot for a vote. This year, nearly as many progressive initiatives as conservative proposals qualified for state ballots.

Nevertheless, progressive groups have been hesitant to embrace the ballot initiative process. “While progressives have largely stood on the sidelines, right-wing groups carried out a comprehensive ballot initiative strategy to mobilize conservative activists and voters around a coherent issue agenda, and keep progressive constituencies-like labor, women, minorities, gays, civil libertarians-scattered and on the defensive,” explained Kristina Wilfore, Executive Director of the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center (BISC).

“Surprisingly, state legislators seem to overlook the important role progressive initiatives play in state politics, and how they can be used effectively in conjunction with a legislative strategy,” noted Washington Sen. Karen Keiser (Flemming Fellow-2002). Ironically, it was progressives and populists that created the initiative process a century ago, in an effort to wrest control of state policy decisions from wealthy special interest groups.

In the early years, many landmark victories were won thanks to the ballot initiative: women were given the right to vote before passage of the 19th Amendment; the minimum wage was increased; and an eight-hour workday was established. Over time, however, use of the ballot initiative process declined.

Then, in 1978, anti-tax crusaders in California sponsored and passed Proposition 13, which slashed property taxes and ignited a nationwide tax revolt. The Reagan victory of 1980 allowed right-wing economic, corporate, and social organizations to launch a coordinated attack that continues today-using the ballot measure system to promote an extremist agenda: so-called “paycheck protection” initiatives used to silence the voices of working families; anti-affirmative action initiatives that turn back the clock on civil rights; anti-choice initiatives that place more restrictions on women’s reproductive health rights; anti-environmental initiatives that give polluters free rein; anti-gay initiatives that sanction discrimination; and voucher initiatives that seek to move public funds away from public schools.

After years of battling the flood of right-wing ballot measures, national progressive groups founded BISC in 1998 to help organizations, legislators and activists wage more effective ballot initiative campaigns.

“We’re trying to help progressives realize that, if used strategically, initiative campaigns can engage disinterested voters, help support progressive candidates, build coalitions, frame a progressive message, and create proactive change,” said Wilfore.

In recent years, progressives have used ballot initiatives to enact clean election laws, protect the environment, increase tobacco taxes to expand health care, and close the gun show loophole.

This November, measures are expected to qualify for the ballot that would increase the minimum wage, lower public school class sizes, and allow same-day voter registration. As Sen. Kendrick Meek and others have learned, ballot initiatives have become an important new battleground for state policy-and progressives are finally ready to take the offensive.

  Summer 2002
  Vol 10, No. 3
 
ALTERNATIVES

Alternatives is a publication of the Center for Policy Alternatives – a nonpartisan progressive public policy and leadership development center serving state legislators, state policy organizations, and state grassroots leaders. Alternatives is indexed in Urban Affairs Abstracts. ISSN #1070-3047

Tim McFeeley,
Executive Director
Jane Gruenebaum,
Chief Operating Officer
Linda Tarr-Whelan,
Board Chair

STATE NETWORKS
Diallo Brooks,
Southeast Director
Bettye Jo Pakulis,
Northeast Director
Jesse Romero,
Southwest Director
John Freeman,
Midwest Consultant
Jewel James,
State Networks Manager

POLICY/COMMUNICATIONS
Bernie Horn,
Senior Director, Policy & Communications
Kirsten Lindquist,
Assoc. Director, Policy
Liz Cattaneo,
Assoc. Dir., Communications
Star Wilbraham,
Communications Assistant
Rachel Balick,
Intern
PROGRAM INITIATIVES
Jen Ray,
Senior Director, Program Initiatives
Helen Gonzales,
Senior Manager, Work and Family Investment
John Wilcox,
Senior Manager, Technology Policy
Jennifer Woolley,
Senior Manager, Women and the Economy Program
Christine Broderick,
Intern, Women and the Economy
LEADERSHIP
Carolina Zumaran-Jones,
Director, Eleanor Roosevelt Global Leadership Institute & Flemming Fellows Leadership Institute
Maura Hutchens,
Manager, ERGLI & FFLI
Meredith Gurwith,
Intern, ERGLI
Rebecca Valerin,
Intern, FFLI
ADMINISTRATION/FINANCE
Maxine G. Somerville,
Senior Director of Administration and Human Resources
Tom Gilmer,
Chief Financial Officer
Chantel McCloud,
Manager, Payroll & A/P
John Wilcox,
General Counsel
Shawn Hayden,
Office Manager
DEVELOPMENT
Chris Rutledge,
Associate Director of Development

CPA HOME  |  SEARCH ARCHIVE  |  CURRENT EDITION